Pedagogical Erosion Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam di Era Kecerdasan Buatan

Authors

  • Roisul Falah Universitas Wahid Hasyim Semarang, Indonesia
  • Ifada Retno Ekaningrum Universitas Wahid Hasyim Semarang, Indonesia
  • Nur Cholid Universitas Wahid Hasyim Semarang, Indonesia
  • Ghufron Hamzah Universitas Wahid Hasyim Semarang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35964/al-munawwarah.v18i1.742

Keywords:

pedagogical erosion, Islamic Religious Education teachers, artificial intelligence,, tarbiyah ruhaniyah, uswah hasanah

Abstract

The advancement of artificial intelligence in education has brought efficiency to Islamic Religious Education teachers, yet it also poses the risk of pedagogical erosion, namely the gradual weakening of teachers’ pedagogical capacity due to excessive dependence on AI. The main problem addressed in this article lies in the absence of studies that specifically interpret pedagogical erosion in the context of Islamic Religious Education learning and connect it with Ibnu Qayyim al-Jawziyyah’s concept of tarbiyah ruhaniyah. This study aims to explain the meaning of pedagogical erosion in Islamic Religious Education learning and to identify the dimensions of tarbiyah ruhaniyah that are most vulnerable to erosion as the use of AI increases. The method used is a narrative literature review conducted through three stages of analysis: literature mapping, critical synthesis, and the construction of conceptual arguments. The findings show that pedagogical erosion in the context of Islamic Religious Education is not merely the weakening of teachers’ technical competence, but the erosion of teachers’ capacity as murabbi who carry out tazkiyatun nafs, taqwiyat al-iman, muraqabah, and mujahadah through uswah hasanah. The dimension most vulnerable to erosion is tazkiyatun nafs, followed by uswah hasanah, muraqabah, mujahadah, and taqwiyat al-iman. In conclusion, the use of AI in Islamic Religious Education learning needs to be guided by pedagogical and theological awareness so that it does not replace the teacher’s human presence, which is the core of tarbiyah ruhaniyah.

References

Alaiki, A. El, Hadrya, F., Boumaaize, Z., Guider, H., Lafraxo, M. A., Soulaymani, A., Mokhtari, A., & Hami, H. (2025). The global burden of teacher burnout: Evaluating the roles of workload and social support in diverse educational contexts. European Psychiatry, 68(S1), S724–S724. https://doi.org/10.1192/J.EURPSY.2025.1469

Alhur, A. A., Khlaif, Z. N., Hamamra, B., & Hussein, E. (2025). Paradox of AI in Higher Education: Qualitative Inquiry Into AI Dependency Among Educators in Palestine. JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:E74947 Https://Mededu.Jmir.Org/2025/1/E74947, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2196/74947

al-Jauziyah, M. bin A. B. S. I. Q. (2025). Madarijus Salikin. QantaraLit.

al-Jawziyyah, I. Q. (2017). Madarijus salikin: Meniti tahapan menuju Allah. Pustaka Al-Kautsar.

Ambady, A., & Thomas K, V. (2026). Persona pedagogica in crisis: are educators becoming data custodians in the age of AI? Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3389/FRAI.2025.1743016

Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., & Järvelä, S. (2022). The Promises and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence for Teachers: a Systematic Review of Research. TechTrends, 66(4), 616–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11528-022-00715-Y/FIGURES/6

Díaz, B., & Nussbaum, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence for teaching and learning in schools: The need for pedagogical intelligence. Computers & Education, 217, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2024.105071

Gebre, Z. A., Demissie, M. M., & Yimer, B. M. (2025). The impact of teacher socio-emotional competence on student engagement: a meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2025.1526371/TEXT

Gentile, M., Città, G., Perna, S., & Allegra, M. (2023). Do we still need teachers? Navigating the paradigm shift of the teacher’s role in the AI era. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/FEDUC.2023.1161777/TEXT

Ghamrawi, N., Shal, T., & Ghamrawi, N. A. R. (2026). Teacher leadership in AI-integrated K-12 classrooms: agency, identity, and authority. School Leadership & Management, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2026.2637955

Hasan, M. ferdi, Patty, A., Sani, A., & Taufiq, F. (2023). Chat GPT as A Learning Assistant for Islamic Education: A Study In Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Nadwa: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 17(2), 203–230. https://doi.org/10.21580/NW.2023.17.2.26167

Kayıran, D., Sönmez, M., Avcı, A., Yusuf, R., Mohamud, H., Collazos, C., Álvarez-Herrero, J.-F., Augusto, S., & Torres, C. (2026). Teachers’ perceptions of artificial intelligence in curriculum integration: opportunities, concerns, and professional development needs. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 9, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/FRAI.2026.1806165

Manaanu, Y. Al, Halim, F., Fadillah, N. H., & Jiatrahman, F. (2021). Pendidikan Jiwa Prespektif Ibn Qayyim Al Jauziyyah: Kritik Terhadap Pendidikan Jiwa di Barat. Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 21(1), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.24042/AJSK.V21I1.8283

Maskur, S., & Othman, H. bin. (2025). Artificial Intelligence and Islamic Perspective in Student Character Assessment. Nadwa: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 19(1), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.21580/NW.2025.19.1.26153

Nasril, Y., Nahar, S., & Daulay, N. (2025). The Construction of Independent Character Education from the Perspective of Ibn Qayyim Al-Jawziyyah. Fitrah: Journal of Islamic Education, 6(2), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.53802/FITRAH.V6I2.1359

Papakostas, C. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Religious Education: Ethical, Pedagogical, and Theological Perspectives. Religions , 16(5), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/REL16050563

Shanahan, C., & Parker, L. (2026). What Are the Theological and Pedagogical Impacts of the Integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Catholic Religious Education (RE)? 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-05306-0_14

Song, A., & Ko, J. (2026). Preservice ethics teachers’ perceptions of AI ethics education. Journal of Moral Education, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2024.2393353

Trothen, T. J., & Papakostas, C. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Religious Education: Ethical, Pedagogical, and Theological Perspectives. Religions 2025, Vol. 16, Page 563, 16(5), 563. https://doi.org/10.3390/REL16050563

UNESCO. (2023). Technology in education: GEM Report 2023 . https://www.unesco.org/gem-report/en/publication/technology

Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Tran, T., & Du, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 252, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESWA.2024.124167

Wu, D., Chen, M., Chen, X., & Liu, X. (2024). Analyzing K-12 AI education: A large language model study of classroom instruction on learning theories, pedagogy, tools, and AI literacy. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAEAI.2024.100295

Xu, G., Haratyan, F., & Tian, H. (2026). A 2025 systematic review of teacher emotion regulation and well-being: implications for student engagement, learning outcomes, and professional development in EFL contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2025.1715266/XML

Zaharah, Z., Basyit, A., Husein, M. T., Fauzi, A., Arif, Z., & Sina, I. (2024). Revolutionizing Learning: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Islamic Education and the Wave of Transformation. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(4), 5685–5697. https://doi.org/10.35445/ALISHLAH.V16I4.6078

Downloads

Published

2026-03-15

How to Cite

Falah, R., Ekaningrum, I. R., Cholid, N., & Hamzah, G. (2026). Pedagogical Erosion Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam di Era Kecerdasan Buatan. Al-Munawwarah : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 18(1), 474–494. https://doi.org/10.35964/al-munawwarah.v18i1.742

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.